logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.28 2016가합542930
하자보수비 등 청구의 소
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 297,258,190 and KRW 101,00,000 among the Plaintiff, Defendant Asian Trust Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the party 1) The plaintiff is the party 276 households, 3 276 units, 276 units, located in the Leecheon-si Ho-si Ho-si Ho-si Ho-si 909-28 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

(2) The Defendant Asian Trust is the executor of the instant apartment construction project, and the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was a contractor who contracted the instant apartment construction project from the Defendant Asian Trust to perform the instant apartment construction project.

The defendant Guarantee Corporation is a company that guarantees the intervenor's obligation to repair the defects of the apartment of this case.

B. On November 22, 2010, the Intervenor entered into a contract for the warranty of defects with the Defendant Guarantee Corporation and the instant apartment, with the primary debtor as the Intervenor and the secured creditor as the transfer market, and entered into each contract for the warranty of defects as indicated below (hereinafter “each guarantee contract of this case”). The Intervenor entered into a contract for the warranty of defects with the Defendant Guarantee Corporation and deposited it with the echeon City Mayor, which is the authority for usage inspection of the instant apartment.

Since then, the guarantee creditor of each guarantee contract of this case was changed to the plaintiff.

Serial No. 101222201-201-01-010401 November 29, 2010 to November 28, 2011, 201, 170,881,881220-2010-201201-201-201-010402 from November 29, 2010 to November 29, 2012, 20128, 170,881,881, 848 30120-20120-2010-201-040403 from October 29, 2010 to November 20, 2015; 201-201-201-201, 2010-18.

C. On December 14, 2010, the apartment of this case, which occurred a defect, was inspected on December 14, 2010. The Intervenor did not construct the apartment of this case and constructed the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing, or constructed the apartment of this case in a defective manner differently from the drawing or in a defective manner, thereby causing a defect such as rupture, water leakage, etc.

The Plaintiff on May 16, 201, June 24, 2011, and July 201, 201.

arrow