A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) intruded into a Mail through an unreshed gate in which the victim D residing in Pyeongtaek-si C on August 19, 2015; (b) went into a 2,500 won (e.g., the market price on the part of the victim on the e.g., on the e., on the e., on the e., on the e., on the e., from around

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and stolen the victim's property.

2. At around 19:50 on the same day, the Defendant, at the place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article, instructed the Defendant to present an identification card in order to investigate the Defendant’s personal information, and assaulted by the Defendant, such as “YY ZE ZE ZE fE fE fE fFE fE fE fE fE fE fE fE fE fE fE fE fE fch.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of the police officer's duty related to the 112 reporting duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Articles 329, 319 (1), and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination on the application of sentencing guidelines for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act: The scope of recommending the sentencing guidelines for the reasons of sentencing of Article 62-2 of the lower limit: consideration of all circumstances, including the fact that the basic area (two to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties is not much weighted, and that there is no force exceeding the fine;