Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around 01:30 on February 9, 2015, the Defendant found Dora C 402, which is the residence of the former domicile of the Defendant who was divorced from Pyeongtaek-si C, and her wife and her children were frighted while drinking alcohol. The Defendant sent 112 reports, thereby confirming the Defendant’s personal information and listening to the Defendant’s statement about the damage to the Defendant’s former wife, and thereby obstructing the Defendant’s lawful mobilization of the police station 12 when the Defendant sent out 112 reports.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The range of recommended sentencing guidelines for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act: The reasons why a sentence of lower than the recommended sentencing range for the first category of obstruction of performance of official duties (in June to April) shall be imposed on the basic area (in June to April): Considering all circumstances, such as the fact that a police officer, who was dispatched to the police station by searching for the force force of alcohol, has committed contingent crimes, and there are no criminal records for the same kind of crime;