beta
Text
1. Defendant A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.
However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are the defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and B, around February 2009, established the HH in order to operate the Changpo Project, and, around December 2009, applied for the subsidies to be subsidized in the Changpo Complex on December 2, 2009, if the Defendants received the subsidies, they would originally bear the expenses, purchase the factory site and new factory construction expenses, use them for the original cost, and make a disguised use of the subsidies as if they were used for the original purpose, Defendant C, the representative director of the I Bank in charge of the development of new products, and Defendant C, the representative director of the I Bank in charge of the design, and Defendant D, who is the representative director of the JB Bank in charge of the design, remitted the subsidies as service payment,
1. Defendants A and B in collusion with the Defendants in violation of the Act on Fraud and Subsidy Management to the effect that they submitted the subsidy program period from 123-1 in Pyeongtaek-gun, Pyeongtaek-gun, Pyeongtaek-gu, 2009, to K, who is a public official in charge of subsidies from the victim Pyeongtaek-gun, “The subsidy period shall be KRW 61.6 million (the national subsidy amount shall be KRW 61.6 million), ② design development cost (the national subsidy amount shall be KRW 27.3 million), ③ production and consulting (the national marketing subsidy shall be KRW 61.6 billion), ④ the subsidy amount shall be KRW 5 million (the subsidy amount shall be KRW 1.5 million), ④ the subsidy amount shall be KRW 5 million (the subsidy amount shall be KRW 5 million), including trademark management expenses (the subsidy shall not be KRW 1.5 million), and the subsidy amount shall be KRW 5 million (the subsidy amount shall be KRW 500,500,000).
However, even if the Defendants were to receive subsidies from the Hamyeong-gun, they thought that they would originally bear the subsidies, such as the cost of purchasing a new product, the cost of developing a new product, the cost of developing a design, and the cost of constructing a factory, and there was no intention or ability to use the subsidy in line with the original purpose of the subsidy.
As above, the Defendants deceiving the public officials in charge of the victim peace group, thereby deceiving them.