logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.31 2015구단1226
국가유공자 비대상자 결정처분 취소
Text

1. On April 27, 2015, the Defendant’s decision of non-persons who rendered distinguished services to the State against the Plaintiff is sleeped.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 10, 2002, the Plaintiff served as a medical fire fighter on October 9, 2004, and was discharged from military service on October 13, 2004. On October 13, 2004, the Plaintiff sustained an injury from the National Fire Fighting School of Yananananan (hereinafter “the instant injury”) moving to the original eths during aquatic rescue and relief training at the National Fire Fighting School of Yananananan (hereinafter “the instant injury”) and filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State, and was recognized as satisfying the requirements for soldier or policeman’s duty, but was determined below the criteria for classification on the physical examination on February 24, 2005.

B. On March 8, 2005, the Plaintiff applied for the re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the State and recognized as satisfying the requirements for soldier or policeman on duty, but was judged to fall short of the standards for rating on February 24, 2006, in a re-verification physical examination on February 24, 2006.

C. In order to undergo a physical examination conducted on November 4, 201, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the State, and “Semangegrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrrgrgrgr

On August 14, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration with the Defendant to grant distinguished service to the State. On April 27, 2015, the Defendant rendered a non-conforming disposition for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the injury and the instant wound (hereinafter “instant wound”). The Defendant rendered a non-conforming disposition for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the injury and the instant wound (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

arrow