1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 7, 1998, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on January 6, 2001, while serving in the Navy on August 21, 1999, after being hospitalized on the ground of knee-comoman's identification during training.

B. On February 4, 2005, the Plaintiff applied for the registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State to the Defendant and recognized its requirements, but was determined below the grade standard in a physical examination on July 14, 2005.

Accordingly, on September 11, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for a re-verification physical examination with the Defendant, and on October 6, 2008, the Plaintiff was registered as a person of distinguished service to the State (or a person of distinguished service to the State) upon receiving a ruling as “Class 7 807” as a result of the re-verification physical examination on the “re-verification of the Maternal Alley Nos. 807 within the left side”.

C. On September 26, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an additional application for recognition of wounds with respect to “the damage, etc. to the external side” with the Defendant, but on February 6, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition that recognized the Plaintiff as a soldier or policeman’s duty corresponding to the requirements for soldier or policeman’s duty.

On March 18, 2015, at the Busan Veterans Hospital, the Plaintiff was determined to have failed to meet the standards of classification as a result of conducting a re-examination on the “margument of ductal pelle on the left side and half of the left side” recognized as a soldier or policeman on March 18, 2015 as a soldier or policeman on duty and on February 6, 2015.

E. On September 9, 2015, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement recognized the requirements for a soldier’s wound (hereinafter “the case’s wound”) as “the case’s wound” with respect to “the fact that the person’s injury to the left-hand side and the left-hand side’s injury to the pelvis” (hereinafter “the case’s wound”), the medical specialist of the relevant specialized department did not have any relation with the injured party in the physical examination. The medical specialist of the relevant specialized department did not have any relation to the grade criteria, and the relevant images and materials were examined in a thorough examination by the Patriots and Veterans Council, and there is a subsequent disability due to the difference in recognition.