beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.
However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is a daily worker at the construction site, and Defendant A is a family owner as a wife married with Defendant B.
Unemployment benefits shall be classified into job-seeking benefits and job-seeking promotion allowances. In the case of a person who had worked for a worker at the time of the final severance, the job-seeking benefits shall be reported to the head of the relevant employment security office when the insured, who had left his/her job, totaled the insured unit period for the 18-month period prior to the date of applying for recognition of eligibility for benefits, and the number of days employed during the one-month period prior to the date of applying for recognition of eligibility for benefits, is less than 10 days.
In addition, the payment of unemployment benefits is a method of receiving unemployment benefits for eight days other than the waiting period (7 days) after confirming that the recipient visited the Employment Center on the first unemployment day after the two weeks after applying for recognition of eligibility for benefits and establishing and submitting a plan for reemployment activities, and receiving the first unemployment benefits on the day or following the date for eight days other than the waiting period (7 days) and receiving the unemployment benefits on the same day or the following day within the prescribed number of days (28 days from 90 days to 240 days).
1. On May 2007, the Defendants conspired to receive unemployment benefits from the Defendants’ residence in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and intended to report the false list of the Defendants’ employees employed by Defendant A to inform the employer of the fact that the Defendants did not actually work but did not work.
A. On August 31, 2015, the Defendants were to meet the requirement for unemployment benefits due to Defendant A’s failure to actually work at the Daegu Employment Center of the Regional Labor Agency.