Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2015, the Defendant appeared in the court No. 2 of the Daegu District Court of Law No. 364, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 364, and took an oath and took a witness of the Defendant’s injury case No. 2014, 2629, and 201.

The defendant's defense counsel "after the defendant went out of the witness's fiff after entering the witness's fiff

“Non-business type......”

The ASEAN has been established subsequent to the completion of control.

The testimony "," and "the crypted after the completion of the ex cryptous"

The Defendant testified to the question, “after the close of the war,” and the answer to the question, “after the end of the war,” “Is to the question,” “Is to the answer,” which “Is to the answer, after the end of the war, Is to the end of the war.” At the end of the war, Is to the Defendant’s body and body fighting in the E F restaurant located in the Daegu Suwon-gu D around May 29, 2014, after the end of the war.

“The testimony was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, at that time, immediately after the Defendant and C begin the dispute, there was a fact that: (a) the Defendant entered the restaurant at C’s request; (b) the Defendant took the face of C in his hand and fell off to the floor by pushing ahead with plastics; (c) C took the face of the Defendant in his hand; and (d) C took the face of the Defendant in his hand, and there was a fact that C told the Defendant with C.

In the facts charged, however, there was a fact that the defendant's children, at that time, viewed all fightings prior to the commencement of fighting and told the defendant who was spawn with the above C.

However, this part of the facts are merely based on the premise stated on the grounds that the defendant's testimony is false. As such, the above facts are modified or supplemented in accordance with the facts acknowledged by the following adopted evidence without the amendment process (Supreme Court Decisions 2003Do5114 Decided January 27, 2004; 2003Do5114 Decided August 24, 2001).