A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Daejeon District Court No. 401, Daejeon District Court No. 45, a 78-ro, the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon District Court No. 16:20, Oct. 12, 201.

The presiding judge stated that the Defendant did not see that the Defendant was unable to see the Defendant’s act of shouldering beer disease at D’s main points or scambling air conditioners.

The question " is faced by the body during a fighting and shaking the cooling."

The answer to the purport that the defendant was "," and the prosecutor's "no act was committed against the defendant by putting him under cooling."

I would like to refer “I would not.” to the question.

“To answer” and the Prosecutor’s “no such fact has been found;

I would not have any question “I would not see”.

“The answer was made.”

However, on November 2, 2015, at the D main points located in E and 2, 2015, the Defendant took a bath on the ground that C filed a report to 112 on the ground that C reported to E and 112, and showed a witness to the view that C was breaking the beer's disease being kept in the air conditioners in the air conditioners by cutting down the air conditioners in the air conditioners, and destroying the spackers on the ground of the air conditioners in the air conditioners.

Nevertheless, the defendant testified false facts against his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Recording notes of the examination of witness;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Written opinion (A), written opinion (I), recording (F);

1. An investigation report (F telephone statement hearing report) (The Defendant deemed that H and C fighting fighting was faced with air conditioners while fighting the body, but C was unable to sprink the beer and spack the air conditioners by sponsing air conditioners. However, the facts of the charge are denied by the Defendant’s statement to the effect that C was unable to sprink the beer and spack the air conditioners on the air condition. However, the following circumstances recognized by the evidence of this case, namely, F was the person who reported 112 first and reported 112.