The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although the Defendant made a false statement as a result of his memory and made a false statement, and did not have any perjury. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (an amount of four million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the defendant appeared as a witness of the defendant's case, such as assault against C and C, the Busan District Court 2016 Ma 372,856 Ma, and the attorney "E was flick and flicked with A's own neck of his own neck," even though C and E were flick in front of the toilet for the toilet management office of the Busan High-gu D apartment in Busan High-gu, and flicked two persons between C and E.

this fact is described in this chapter.

G. G. G. L. L. L. L. L.W. for the question.

I have no record of this entry.

“In the end, C gives testimony to the question “I do not have any fact that he assaulted the part of E” and the question “I do not have any physical contact between C and E at all,” of the Prosecutor’s “I do not correct only by the speech that C is memoryed.”

For the purpose of this Act,

I have taken place.

It is sufficiently recognized that there was a false statement contrary to memory by making a false statement in response to the question "I would like to know that there was no situation that could have occurred at the time of body".

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. It is recognized that there is no particular criminal history except for a suspended sentence once and a fine twice, and there is no history of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, perjury is a judicial action of the country.