logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2014.09.18 2014고단309
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter trucks in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving).

On June 10, 2014, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license on June 20, 2014, proceeded along the three-lane road in front of the E Hospital in the Syang-si D along the two-lane distance from the distance of the National Food and Drug Research Institute to the new village distance.

At the time, the Defendant changed the three-lanes from the two-lane and the said three-lanes of the passenger car driven by the Victim F is proceeding in the same direction. Thus, despite the duty of care to prevent the accident by taking into account whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle is a motor vehicle running on the three-lanes in order to change the lanes and not to conflict, the Defendant changed the three-lanes without examining whether there is the above vehicle operating on the three-lanes, and carried out a traffic accident where the left part of the said vehicle was left to the right side of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury of the above victim, such as the right-hand sprink in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the multiple sprink in need of treatment for about three days, etc. to the victim H who was accompanied by the above car, and the victim I who was accompanied by the above car, suffered from the injury of the affected sprinke in need of treatment for about one day.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph (1), operated the foregoing cargo vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Mandatory insurance policy, the ledger of driver's license, the register of vehicle driving licenses, and written statements and estimates;

1. A written confirmation of hospitalization, a certificate of origin, and a written diagnosis;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow