logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.09.08 2016고정1753
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 11, 2015 to 18:30 on April 11, 2015, the Defendant, at the main point of “M” operated by the victim L in Busan-gu K, demanded the calculation by the injured party, displayed a door he was off and sold, and obstructed the victim’s main business by force.

In addition, the Defendant interfered with the work of the victims five times as described in the list of crimes as follows.

On April 11, 2015, 18:00 to 18:30 on April 11, 2015, 2015, the victim’s interference with the victim’s work at the temporary storage place was paid without the alcohol level of K M M’’ at the Busan Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y, and the victim’s disturbance was forced to avoid disturbance, and the victim’s disturbance was not interfered with the performance of duties by force by force, such as talking the victim, and pushing the victim, etc., on May 18, 2015, 201, see how there was no money in the accommodation charge of QM Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 23:50 to 50 on May 19, 2015.

The summary of evidence of crime that interfered with the performance of duties by force by avoiding disturbance, such as noise, etc., on July 19, 2015, 22:2:20 to 22:40 on July 19, 2015, 42:20-22:40 on July 19, 2015, and by force on the part of avoiding disturbance, such as paying time fees, etc., on July 19, 2015, 21:0-2:00 to 22:00 on July 19, 2015, which interfered with the performance of duties by force.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police statement protocol on V, Y, S, P, and L;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that there are many criminal offenses and interferences with business against the defendant, while the victim P and S are the same.

arrow