logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.03.08 2015가단7710
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 2 through 5 (hereinafter “each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet”) is a transfer registration for ownership between the trust company E (hereinafter “E”) and the K non-real estate trust company on October 29, 2010. As such, the registration for transfer of ownership was returned to E upon termination of the trust contract of E on June 28, 2013, and the registration for transfer of ownership was completed in the Plaintiff’s name on the same day.

B. The real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) refers to the four commercial buildings as seen earlier and the instant commercial buildings, among E and the International Asset Trust Co., Ltd., on March 9, 2009, the ownership transfer registration was made between E and the International Asset Trust Co., Ltd. on the ground that the trust agreement was terminated on April 20, 2010, and the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of E upon the termination of the trust agreement. The ownership transfer registration was completed in the Plaintiff’s name on January 13, 2014.

C. At present, the Defendants are operating a mutual key point of “F” in each of the instant commercial buildings.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants, the occupant of each of the instant commercial buildings, are obligated to deliver each of the instant commercial buildings to Plaintiff A, the owner of each of the said commercial buildings, and the instant commercial buildings, respectively, to Plaintiff B, the owner of the said commercial buildings, barring any special circumstance.

3. Determination as to the defendants' defense

A. The gist of the Defendants’ defense is as follows: (a) between Defendant D and E, the former owner of each of the instant commercial buildings, on May 15, 2013; and (b) from May 28, 2013 to May 2018.

arrow