Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 150,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2015, the Defendant violated the red signal signal and driven the CK5 car owned by the State (State) 11:23 on October 11, 2015, 1429, 1429, and 3rd-down 1 lane in the direction of light carbon from the ebban Eup of Pakistan to the direction of light 19K.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. An inspection report, inspection report, or investigation report (a report on the analysis of inspection results and a report on the inspection report of the unmanned controlling device attached thereto);

1. Unmanned camera control photographs and investigation reports (Attachment to photographs of suspect signal violations places);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 156 Subparag. 1 of the relevant Act and Article 156 of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 13829, Jan. 27, 2016); and the selection of fines for criminal facts

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the issue of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant's driving of the instant vehicle was true, but since the defendant was at the time engaged in safe operation by carrying the defendant's mother's mother at the time, it did not violate the signal as stated in the facts charged of the instant case.

In light of the following circumstances, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., the unmanned control camera (F5788) appears to operate in a way that photographs of the violating vehicle were taken by cutting off the vehicle into the intersection by violating the signal through the reduction line installed at the point of entry into the intersection and reducing the vehicles entering the intersection. After the expiration of 11.64 seconds after the red signal was cut off, the Defendant was cut off to enter the intersection of this case and passed through the intersection of this case and passed at 13.743 seconds, and was taken photographs of the violating vehicle. ② According to the self-inspection report on July 14, 2015 and July 12, 2016, the error ratio of the unmanned control camera of this case is 0%.