logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.11.27 2019고정926
양곡관리법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A is the representative director who operates a trade name of “B agricultural partnership corporation” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City in Gyeonggi-gu.

No grain processing operator or grain dealer may make any indication or advertisement that is different from the fact or exaggerated with respect to the production year, quality, etc. of grain.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, despite the fact that the Gmark Certification (Gamedo Governor Certification) supplied to D High Schools and E-high Schools between October and November 201, 2016, was set out in F, “F,” which is part of the 20cc general rice 392 g (total 7,840 g), supplied 241 g (4,820 g), as if it were a rice certified as Gmark, supplied a school meal service in the Gmark rice pos.

B. As to the affairs of the above defendant A at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a) above to the defendant B.

In the same manner as the statement in the claim was written.

2. The Defendants and the defense counsel asserted that “When Defendant A supplies rice intended in F as described in paragraph (a) of Article 1 of the above facts charged, the Gmark marked in Spos was put one day with the shoulder, and explained it to the dietitians of each school, the Defendants did not have any fact different from the facts or exaggerated display or advertisement.”

3. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, as described in paragraph (a) of Article 1 of the above facts charged, Defendant A supplied D High Schools and E High Schools around October 201 to 2016, but Defendant A provided as above the foregoing Domination facilities of the Domination enterprise, which had been traded with the Defendants on October 2016. From February 201, 2010 to November 111, 2016, G worked as dietitian at D High Schools as a dietitian from the Defendant A’s previous Gmark factory’s mechanical failure.

arrow