Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, each of the two years from the date of the final judgment against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who engages in grain sales business under the trade name of "D" in Gyeonggi Kimpo-si, and Defendant B is a person who works as a factory site of the above D.

No grain processing operator or grain dealer may make any indication or advertisement different from the facts or exaggerated with respect to the production year, quality, etc. of grain.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to sell low price of rice in 209 and 2011 and 2010 and conspired to sell rice in 2012, and if Defendant A instructed Defendant B to 2009 and 2011 and 3:7% of the rice in 2012 to be mixed with the rice in 2012, Defendant B packaged the rice in accordance with the instructions, and then arbitrarily indicated the date of Domination with D as if the above rice was dried in the packaging site of the said rice in D factory.

As above, the Defendants sold rice with a different production year, Dominants, and Domination date, etc. from January 24, 2013 to February 15, 2013, after receiving 28,44,750 g amounting to 16,390 g amount in sum from three business parties, such as national logistics, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from January 24, 2013 to February 15, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. As a result of each new guidance and appraisal, a copy of the ledger of the sales place, a copy of each statement of transactions, a copy of the purchasing place, a copy of the purchase place, a copy of the ledger of customers, a copy of the passbook of 2012, a copy of the passbook of 2012, a copy of the passbook of the passbook, a copy of the certificate of origin, a copy of the certificate of origin, a copy of the account book and the California, a copy of the investigation report (D on-site photographs),

1. Defendants: Article 34 subparag. 4 of the Grain Management Act, Article 20-3 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

1. The suspended sentence shall be sentenced in consideration of the overall circumstances, such as the fact that the defendants under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act confessions the facts charged in the instant case and reflects the facts charged, but the defendants shall be fined for the same kind