logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.03.11 2015고단3256
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened the Internet shopping mall E in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, 102; (b) advertised that he was manufactured in China by misappropriationing overseas famous trademarks (hereinafter referred to as “fluorization of household goods”); (c) advertised that he was a lux sports brand file, such as her age, height, ID, and cover; and (d) prepared and posted a luxation of sports purchased from the said shopping mall as if the quality was good; and (c) intended to sell household goods sports by deceiving buyers.

1. Fraud, attempted fraud, and violation of the Trademark Act relating to "2015 Gooman 3256";

A. On April 17, 2015, the Defendant, on April 17, 2015, sold the said shopping mall to the victim F, who ordered the said shopping mall’s cherbization by reporting age, as if he/she were the cherbization at the age of the household goods, and received KRW 111,000 from the victim F through the credit card settlement from April 17, 2015 to August 18, 2015, and acquired KRW 1,832 from the victim 1,832 in total, as shown in the attached crime list (1) of the list of crimes in the attached Table (1), by selling as if he/she were the cherbation of the household goods, and by receiving KRW 303,864,100,00 in total, as the price for the sale.

B. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant attempted to sell 187,000 won from the above G to the victim G who ordered the said shopping mall by reporting the said shopping mall, as if it was a flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flive flives. However, the Defendant attempted to receive 187,00 won from the above G through the credit card settlement after the said transaction, but attempted to receive 2,151,000 won from the victims over 11 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes (2) from April 22, 2015 to August 7, 2015.

(c)

A trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark in violation of the Trademark Act shall be goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

arrow