logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.03.11 2015고단3295
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2015, the Defendant opened the Internet shopping mall E (F) in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, and advertised virtual sports branding as if he had completed the physicalization of virtual goods, such as age, IDs, and ri uniforms, and prepared and posted a gymization purchased from the said shopping mall as if he had good quality, thereby selling virtual gymization by deceiving buyers.

1. Fraud related to the 2015 Highest 3295 Highest 3295, attempted attempts, and violations of the Trademark Act;

A. On April 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported the said shopping mall on April 17, 2015; (b) sold the victim G, who ordered Lanpy pumps Furgization, as if they were the refined pactivization; and (c) received KRW 187,000 from the said G through the credit card settlement as the price; and (d) obtained KRW 187,000 from April 17, 2015 to August 13, 2015 from the said G through the credit card settlement; and (e) obtained KRW 1,688 in total, 1,688, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form (1) from April 17, 2015 to August 13, 2015.

B. On April 21, 2015, the Defendant attempted to sell the said shopping mall by deceiving the victim H, who ordered the said shopping mall to her ageen cherculation, as if he/she were a cherculatory cherculcization in her age in the lux. While the Defendant received 111,000 won from the above H under his/her name through the credit card settlement, following the said transaction, he/she sought payment from the above H by cancelling the credit card and attempted to receive an attempted payment from April 21, 2015 to July 28, 2015, including the cancellation of the credit card payment. However, the Defendant attempted to receive 3,364,90 won from the victims on a total of 23 occasions, such as the weather table (2) once again, but attempted to receive the money of 23 times in total.

(c)

Delivery, sale, forgery, or conspiracy of a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark in violation of the Trademark Act for the purpose of using or allowing another person to use it on the goods identical or similar to the designated

arrow