beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months.
seizure.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On May 9, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Busan District Court on May 9, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on March 11, 2014 at the Busan Detention Center.
[Criminal facts] On February 2016, Defendant A participated in the above crime through Defendant B around June 2016.
In China, as if the online shopping mall was sold through online shopping mall in China, it is intended to acquire profits by deceiving consumers, receiving the price for sportsization, and closing the shopping mall site without delivering the relevant sportsization. Defendant D, Defendant C, the role of opening the website in China, Defendant B, Defendant B, the role of introducing Defendant A, who will lend the name of the business operator, and Defendant A shall register the name of the business operator in PG company, etc. to obtain registration of the business operator and credit card payment, and the role of opening the passbook, official certificate, cell phone, etc., and Defendant D and Defendant C shall have 15% of the profits respectively, Defendant D and Defendant C shall have 50% of the profits, Defendant A shall have 50% of the profits, Defendant B shall have 20% of the profits, and Defendant B shall have 20% of the profits.
On September 7, 2016, the Defendants opened the Internet shopping mall site ‘V' at the influent area below the Chinese depth on September 7, 2016, posted a sale product photograph and the Internet telephone and mobile phone numbers opened in the name of the Defendant, as if they sold old ice, age, Ri, and IDs in a foreign brand, and ordered the victim W to order the victim W to see it as a normal site.
However, in fact, even if the Defendants received money from the victims as the purchase price for the sports movement, they did not deliver the relevant sports movement, but did not have the intent or ability to sell the relevant sports movement to the victims.
The Defendants conspired with each other for the same day.