logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.11.28 2014고단1668
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 18, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on April 18, 2008, to a fine of two million won for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Gwangju District Court's net support on July 19, 2012, and to a fine of two million won for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Gwangju District Court's net support on July 23, 2014, in the Gwangju District Court's net support on July 23, 2014, and is currently being

On September 12, 2014, at around 01:15, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a car with C Adradical motor vehicle from the date near the inn water viewing road located in the relevant school at a leisure time to the front of the school fire fighting unit located in the same Dong at the same time, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.086%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the actions taken against the driver, and report on the status of the driver's practice;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Before judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (a written judgment and a copy of summary order);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict punishment of the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant committed a second offense during the period of suspension of execution due to drunk driving, etc., but the defendant is against the defendant, the driving distance is not visible, there are no criminal records other than driving under drinking or without a license, and other circumstances indicated in the instant case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., shall be determined as per the order.

arrow