1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. After completing doctoral degree courses at the graduate school of the number of college B, the Plaintiff was working as a doctoral researcher at the graduate school of the number of medical colleges at C University at around 2015, and the victim D (hereinafter “victim”) entered the department of the number of medical colleges at around September 2014.

From January 2015, the Plaintiff had been engaged in the experiment while guiding the victim as a mentor of the victim.

B. After that, on March 1, 2016, the Plaintiff was appointed as an assistant professor with the department of medicine and medicine in the number of colleges in the second half of the year of 2015, following the public bonds of the former faculty.

C. On May 2, 2017, the Defendant deemed that the Plaintiff violated Article 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act, and accordingly, dismissed the Plaintiff through a resolution of the General Disciplinary Committee on Public Educational Officials at B University pursuant to Article 51 of the Public Educational Officials Act and Article 78 (1) 3 of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

1. On September 24, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) placed the victim under the influence of alcohol on the victim’s officetels; and (b) kids the victim’s tam against the victim’s will; and (c) kids the victim’s kis.

2. The Plaintiff maintained an inappropriate relationship from the above point of time to July 28, 2016, maintaining an inappropriate relationship, such as continuing to communicate with the victim and communicating with the victim.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff sought the revocation of the instant disposition to the Appeal Committee for Teachers, and the Appeal Committee for Teachers, on August 23, 2017, stated that “The grounds for disposition cannot be recognized as the act before appointment because it is an act before appointment,” but the grounds for disposition can be reflected in a disciplinary decision, and the grounds for disposition can be recognized as a series of acts that began before and after appointment, but may be recognized as a reason for disposition. Considering the various reasons for determination, it is appropriate to take the instant disposition solely based on paragraph (2) of the said disposition.”