logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.03.29 2016고단4177
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) mispercing the Defendants that they had expressed a desire to the victims E ( South, North, and South, North, and 20 years old) who passed through the scene of the Daejeon National Bank of Korea on September 7, 2016, around D and D, and around 05:20 on September 7, 2016, and that they had expressed a desire to the victims.

The term “the victims” refers to the victims’ bating bat, and D used them together, leading the victims to the sib where they were stopped near the victims, leading the victims to the head of the victims E, Defendant B and D committed joint assault by the victims, such as drinking and satching the victims who were forced to board the victims on the back of the said sib.

Accordingly, the Defendants assaulted victims jointly with D.

2. Defendants and D interfered with the performance of official duties were able to take serious bath for the reason that they were arrested victims H (the remaining and the age of 25) who were dispatched after receiving a report on the said assault at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1) above, and attempted to arrest them as current criminals, and D was scambling with their chests by hand, and Defendant B and Defendant B were scamed with the victim I (the male and the age of 54) who were employed by the police station in the Daejeon War, and the victim I (the male and the age of 54) who was employed by the Defendant B and the Defendant A committed joint assault by both descendants to the victims, such as scambling the chest part of the victim I into the upper bottom.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with D and interfered with the legitimate execution of police officer's duties such as suppression of crimes and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. I's self-statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow