Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2016, the Defendants expressed a desire to the J in the process of confirming the details of the report to Defendant A by the victim of the victim’s International District of the Daejeon Police Station I Station, which was called upon Defendant A’s 112 report, at the H restaurant located in the Dae-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 2, 2016, and during the process of confirming the details of the report to Defendant A, etc., the victim J ( South, 47 years old) may be punished for insult against the Defendants.

The notification was made by Defendant B, who took part in the victimJ, walked with the victim J's buckbuck site, and Defendant A her joint spacked with the fuckbbbbbbs. Defendant B, who followed the victim K ( South, 29 years old) in order to arrest the Defendants as a flagrant offender in the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, was able to take the back on the back of the victim K by hand, and the Defendant B opened the victim K's ear, who took part in it, and obstructed the police officer's lawful execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers' reports and arrest of flagrant offenders by assaulting and threatening the victims, such as following the victim K's back, faceing, threateninging the victim's her face.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police of the K and J;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The part dismissing public prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Order to Provide community service (defendant A) and Order to attend lectures for the Defendants

1. On November 2, 2016, the Defendants’ dismissal part of the public prosecution is the Defendant at the H cafeteria located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu on November 2, 2016, and the victim J of the developments leading up to the attachment of the police station I district of Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, who was called upon Defendant A’s 112 report.