logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2017.04.27 2016고단749
상해등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended sentence for special damage, etc. in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on October 22, 2015, and on October 30, 2015, which became final and conclusive on October 30, 2015, the suspended sentence was revoked in the same court on February 23, 2016, and the execution of the sentence was completed in the Seosan Branch of the Hong prison on August 2, 2016.

1. In around 19:30 on October 4, 2016, the Defendant suffered from injury to the victim C (47 tax) without any reason due to the influence of alcohol in the vicinity of the office of Taean-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun, and the latter part of the office of Taean-gun, Taean-gun. Around 19:30 on October 4, 2016, the Defendant sustained the victim’s face at one time by drinking the victim’s face at one time, and sustained the victim’s face by taking advantage of the victim’s body body, and sustained the victim’s face by taking advantage of the victim’s face, the Defendant sustained the victim’s injury such as the closure of a non-permanent

2. Obstruction of business;

A. On December 28, 2015, the Defendant demanded that the above victim “a breging, rework,” from the second floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the victim E (M, F, E, 68 years old) located in Thai-gun, Chungcheongnam-do around 01:36 on December 28, 2015, the Defendant demanded that the victim “a breging, rework,” but the victim did not comply therewith;

Purpose of this Act is whether it is a lebal

“Along on about one-hour period of time, she interfered with the business of the accommodation facility of the victim by force by avoiding disturbances, such as interfering with the waters of the guests.”

B. On August 14, 2016, at around 01:44, the Defendant demanded the victim to “absing” in front of the victim H (ma, 47 years of age) operated by the victim H, but the victim did not comply with the demand by the victim stating that “absing would have no abstinence,” and whether the victim’s “abstinence would have no abstinence.”

The purpose of this article is to avoid the disturbance between about 30 minutes, such as making a great bath, thereby obstructing the business of the accommodation of the victim by force.

(c)

On August 22, 2016, the Defendant found the victim H in Thai-gun G G around 22:2:37, and found the victim’s “Nil Day.”

arrow