logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.08.30 2016고단484
공무집행방해등
Text

1. The punishment of the accused shall be one year and six months;

2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of traffic laws on roads, and violation of traffic laws on roads;

A. On May 13, 2016, at around 00:21, the Defendant driven C 320-d motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol level 0.208% while under the influence of alcohol in the influence of alcohol, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the Do in front of the public parking lot located in the two-way market in Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, the Defendant, at approximately 78-132 meters away from the Do in front of the public parking lot.

B. On May 13, 2016, at around 17:10, the Defendant driven C 320D cars while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.13% while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.13%, without obtaining a driver’s license, at approximately 12 km section from the front of the said green apartment through the road 299-8, from the Do in front of the said apartment.

2. On May 13, 2016, the Defendant, at around 17:30 on May 13, 2016, received a 112 report stating that “the drinking driver is changed” at the 102 parking lot in the Taedong-gu, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, the Defendant would be required to take a drinking test from E, who was called out after receiving a 112 report and received a request for a drinking test from E, who is affiliated with the D police unit in the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do., the Defendant would require the above E to

“In doing so, the above E was abused the floor by breaking the breath of the breath in hand, breaking the breath of the above E by drinking, twice the breath of the breath, once with the hand floor of the above E, and assaulting the head of the above E by fingers.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Statement report on the situation of the driver at each driving school and the driver's license register;

1. Application of field photographs, video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The driving of the relevant legal provision on criminal facts: Article 148-2(2)1 of the Road Traffic Act (referred to as 0.208%) and Article 148-2(2)2 of the Road Traffic Act (referred to 0.208%).

arrow