logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고정492
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) connected to the Rober “C” page from the 14:01 Franchis on February 15, 2017, the Defendant sold the victim D [price] xds mini3 electrical bicycles.

Notice of the title "," and this blished blish blish blish blish

“.....” “Eargue Mabrost Mabrost

“Irrepared human life”, “Irreparable human life.”

Ga, posted comments on the purport that “I will live only in a astronomical life,” “Isk,” “Isk,” and “Isk,” thereby openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of statutes on the screen of each Internet page;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion and judgment on Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is consistent with the Defendant’s writing written in the instant criminal facts. However, even if the victim is specified, even if the circumstance of the instant case was genuine intent of the Defendant, the victim concluded that the Defendant’s act was interfered with the sale of the Defendant’s act without any grounds, thereby causing a dispute, and the Defendant voluntarily deleted the comments after the dispute with the victim (as a whole, the time of posting comments is about 1 hours and 25 minutes), and even if the damage therefrom does not meet the requirements for the crime of insult or even if it falls under such requirements, illegality is dismissed as a justifiable act under Article 20 of the Criminal Act.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant's assertion is not accepted since the facts charged are found guilty, since the victim's specific elements, illegality, etc. are all satisfied.

(a).

arrow