logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.06.16 2019나69332
구상금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement for D bus vehicles owned by the said company (hereinafter “Plaintiff bus vehicles”) with C, and the Defendant is a bus transport business entity that owns E bus vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant bus vehicles”).

B. On July 17, 2018, at 22:45, the Plaintiff bus driving the two-lanes of the road 128-lane (including the exclusive lane prior to the front line) in front of the Dong-dong Zone 128 (including the exclusive lane prior to the front line) at a speed of about 50 km in the speed of the speed from the front side of the BanIC bank. The Plaintiff bus driving the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the road prior to the front zone at a speed of about 50km in the speed of the speed from the front line to the long distance of the city. On the other hand, the vehicle parked in the front line to the four-lanes of the exclusive lane prior to the right line by avoiding the vehicle parked in the front line at the speed of the right line, and the signal of its direction at the time of passing through the internal distance (hereinafter

C. In order for Defendant bus vehicles to proceed along the intersection from the intersection of the intersection of this case to the inland slope, the front side of the intersection of this case stopped to three lanes prior to the intersection of this case (including the exclusive lane on the front side and the exclusive lane prior to the right side of right side of the road (including the front side and the exclusive lane prior to the right side of the right side road) and went through the intersection of this case, and the signal of the direction at the time was stopped, but it was anticipated that the signal of this direction would be changed to the road of this case, and that it would be changed to the road of this case, and the passage was caused by the accident that the central part of the right side of the Plaintiff bus vehicles entering the intersection of this case and the front part of the Defendant bus vehicles.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) D.

After the accident of this case, the Plaintiff bus vehicle continued to proceed and entered the factory building of F, a corporation F, located in the direction of 10 cc of the running room, and shocked the above factory building, its entrance and exit, and the G Poter II vehicle of F, a corporation F, which was parked in the above factory.

E. The plaintiff.

arrow