1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

1. On April 5, 2017, around 12:25, a claim for reimbursement related to a traffic accident that occurred at the port-based intersection of 177 (231 as follows) in the following city at the following city (see, e.g., the level of the accident site) (see, e., the level of the accident site)

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle (A), when the signal of the direction was red, entered the intersection as is, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle (B), also entered the intersection even if the signal of the direction was a yellow signal prior to reaching the intersection before reaching the intersection, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle had already entered the intersection before reaching the intersection, and that the Defendant’s vehicle had already entered the intersection before reaching the intersection, and thus, the Plaintiff’s driver would have been able to find the Defendant’s vehicle prior to entering the intersection. In light of the fact that the instant accident occurred at the location where the Defendant’s vehicle almost passing through the intersection (i.e., the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, and the purport of oral argument), it is reasonable to view that the instant accident was caused by the negligence between the Defendant’s vehicle entering the intersection and the Plaintiff’s vehicle, in violation of the signal, and the fault ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle was 40:60 in light of the aforementioned circumstances.

3. The plaintiff's appeal is without merit.