logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1983. 9. 27. 선고 82도267 판결
[업무상과실치사][공1983.11.15.(716),1624]
Main Issues

Whether a full-time Deputy Director is obligated to confirm and check the opening and closing of entrance doors of the Gangseo-gu.

Summary of Judgment

The Deputy Director, who served on a train, shall confirm and check whether the entrance entrance of the passenger vehicle is open or not, and if the entrance is opened, shall take measures to close it and operate the train, to prevent the fall accident in the open entrance of the entrance.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 268 of the Criminal Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney Yoon Gyeong-hee

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Criminal Court Decision 81No3415 delivered on December 28, 1981

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The defendant's defense counsel's grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the records, since the entrance entrance of the train of this case was installed automatically by machine operation so that the opening and closing operation itself does not belong to the defendant's business, not the engineer's company. However, the court below did not deem that the defendant, who was working on the train of this case as the vice head, was occupationally engaged in the business since the entrance entrance of the entrance was not closed by the victim's falling problem. Since the train of this case was in the size of fluor, the defendant working on board as the vice head was in the state of fluor, so if it is confirmed that the entrance was opened due to the fact that the entrance was not opened by the passenger's entrance, it should be prevented from falling in the open entrance, and since he neglected the duty of confirmation and inspection and operated the train in the state of the opening of the entrance, the court below did not err in the misapprehension of the judgment below's reasoning and the decision of the court below as to the first instance court's violation of the rules of evidence and the first instance court's reasoning of the judgment below.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by the assent of all participating judges. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Justices Yoon Il-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow