A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2009, the Defendant, at the office of the head of Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant operated by the Defendant, and the office of the (ju) D, a company (ju), to supply the victim’s (ju), with the name and influence on the date of the human transport. The Defendant, at the time of the delivery, will pay the price by the end of two months after the date of each supply.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant was in the state of receiving loans of approximately KRW 50 million from the Industrial Bank of Korea, Han Bank, and New Bank, and the Small and Medium Business Corporation was making it difficult to manage the company due to investment failure of KRW 650 million granted by the Small and Medium Business Corporation. Moreover, even if the Defendant was supplied with the brea and supplied the brea name, etc., the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the breath even if he was supplied with the breath name and the breath name and supplied the breath name and the breath name, etc., to the extent that the amount of the breath’s management was insufficient to pay the breath’s money.

Nevertheless, around June 16, 2009, the Defendant received an amount equivalent to KRW 511,00 from the injured party as well as an amount of 5,11,00 from May 3, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the ledger on transactions and attempted attempts by company (1), written confirmation of balance of transactions, and statutes on the statement of passbooks to each company;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] General Frauds No. 1 (within KRW 100,000) (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [Pronouncement Decision] The case of the instant crime is not less than anything less than anything less than anything else but not less than anything less than anything less than anything less than anything less than anything else and the amount of damage is less than anything less than anything less than anything else. However, the Defendant’s mistake against