(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.01 2015고단1021 (1)

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.01 2015고단1021 (1)

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants: (a) leased 7 officetels 301, 303, 704, 1212, and 1401 of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Etel and 904, and 1001 of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fteltel, with the trade name of “C”, and (b) decided that, with the knowledge that, with the knowledge of the fact that, with the knowledge of the fact that, with the fact that, with the fact that, with the fact that, with the fact that, with the fact that, with the fact that, in this case, the Defendants were aware of the fact that they engaged in commercial sex acts by sending the advertisement letters to the above sttel, they would take the role of leading customers to the sttel by receiving KRW 100,000 per day from the above stude women.

The Defendants: (a) around February 5, 2015, at the office of arranging commercial sex acts of “D” in Seoul, Gangnam-gu Seoul Building 507; (b) entered the Republic of Korea as a tourist visa; and (c) let Thai female J, which was found to be the introduction of the said H and I, enter Gangnam-gu Seoul Etel 303; (d) using the Internet SP 17 letter transmission website and 10 mobile phones, sent to many unspecified mobile phones the commercial sex acts of “Sussia, 180,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00.

In collusion with C, the defendant A from January 9, 2015 to the same year.

1. By December 24, 200, the Defendants were from the same year.

1. The same year from around 25.

2. Until May 2, 200, up to Nos. 3 through 9 of the annexed list of crimes, the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. was conducted by the above methods as stated in each corresponding number of days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against C or I;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants C, I, N, and each police interrogation protocol

1. Each police officer of the O, J, P, Q, R, T, U,V, and W.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.17 2015고단1021

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.01.17 2019고단2826

-서울북부지방법원 2020.06.11 2020고단14

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.07 2017고단4182

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.21 2020고단4442