1. The Defendant’s respective money and each of them described in the table Nos. 2, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J, respectively.

1. Presumed factual basis

A. The Korea National Housing Corporation (the defendant was merged with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009 and became the defendant. The defendant was not classified before and after the merger) obtained approval from the Gyeonggi-do Governor of the Housing Site Development Promotion Act on November 6, 1995 of the Gyeonggi-do Housing Development Promotion Act for the housing site development project for the housing site of Gyeonggi-do AD, AE (AF, AG) (hereinafter “instant development project”), revision of the housing site development plan and implementation plan on May 6, 1997, and obtained approval for modification of the housing site development plan and the housing site development project implementation plan on several occasions thereafter.

B. In 197, the Defendant commenced the construction project after obtaining approval of the project plan for one complex of 792 (total public sale; hereinafter “instant apartment complex”) and 1,935 (public sale 368 households, workers’ welfare 1,000 households, public lease 567 households, and hereinafter “instant apartment complex of 2 complex”) in the said zone.

C. Around June 2000, the Defendant obtained a modified approval for the business plan to build 1,934 households among the 1,935 households of the instant two complex around February 2000 and the 1,934 households of the instant two complex as public rental.

On June 28, 2000 for the apartment complex of this case with respect to the added public rental household, the defendant announced each of the public announcements around February 22, 2000 for the apartment complex of this case.

On January 200, the defendant completed the apartment complex of this case, and around November 2000, the apartment complex of this case (hereinafter referred to as "each apartment complex of this case") respectively, and completed the completion of the development project of this case on June 30, 202.

E. The Defendant leased each of the of the instant apartments as a publicly constructed rental house for five years, and the mandatory rental period of each of the instant apartments has arrived at as of the date of conversion for sale in lots, and each of the instant apartments stated in the “Dong and lake” column of attached Table 2 among the Plaintiffs and each of the instant apartments is the same Table.