1. The defendant, to the council of occupants' representatives of the plaintiff A1 apartment complex, 118,134,736 won, and the plaintiff A2 apartment complex.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The party status 1) Plaintiff A’s council of occupants’ representatives (hereinafter “Plaintiff A’s council of occupants’ representatives”) is limited to “Plaintiff A’s council of occupants’ representatives”

3) The apartment complex A1 complex in Gangnam-si is an apartment complex of 173 households in Gangnam-si (hereinafter “1 complex apartment complex”).

For the management, an autonomous management body consisting of occupants around March 15, 2017, and the council of occupants' representatives of Plaintiff A2 apartment complex (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff A2 apartment complex council") is the council of occupants' representatives.

3) The apartment complex A2 complex of Gangnam-si D is an apartment complex of 371 households (hereinafter “2 complex apartment complex”).

(2) For the management, the Defendant is a company incorporated on December 30, 2009, which was divided into F, which obtained approval of a rental housing construction project plan from Gangnam-si on January 19, 2003 and was established on December 30, 2009, in order to construct rental housing to Gangnam-si E.

(hereinafter referred to as “Defendants” in total. B.

1) The Defendant newly constructed the instant apartment complex with the approval of the construction project plan of the instant apartment complex on January 19, 2003, and had undergone a pre-use inspection on December 26, 2005. On January 19, 2006, the Defendant recruited occupants after obtaining approval for the public announcement of the invitation of each of the above rental apartment complexes from Gangseo-si, and managed the instant 1 and 2 apartment complex as a rental business operator. 2) The Defendant converted the instant rental apartment complex from November 23, 2016 to November 28, 2016 from the expiration of the mandatory rental period for the instant 1 and 2 apartment complex into lots, from November 29, 2016 to the expiration of the final period of sale in lots from November 29, 2016 to December 12, 2016 to the expiration of the final period of sale in lots within the period of 17th 19th 17th 207.

3. As a result, the defendant has 133 households among the 173 households of apartment complexes of this case, and 309 households among the apartment complexes of this case.