logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.22 2014나2046387
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is subject to Paragraph (1).

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the basic facts and the defendant’s defense on this part is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. As such, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. From 2nd 9th 12th 12th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e.

(b) To delete all parts of 2 pages.

C. The 3rd side “Concluding” was amended as follows, and the registration of the transfer of the right to the instant intellectual property in the name of the Defendant was completed between K through B, as shown in the separate list of intellectual property rights.

Each amendment to the terms “Pledge” and “Japan Es.S.” of the 3th 16th 16 parallels to the terms “Pledge creation” and “ELS,” respectively, the third 17th 17 parallels to the terms “KNEex,” and the term “KNEex, 2010. 26th 4th 11 parallels to the terms “from October 26, 2010 to December 7, 2010”, respectively.

(e) 4.The addition to the following "including paper numbers" of 14 pages:

F. Under 5, the Plaintiff became aware of the instant transfer through the Korean Intellectual Property Office, an affiliated organization, through the Korean Intellectual Property Office, and on May 23, 201, through the National Tax Service, which was an affiliated organization, that the non-party company was insolvent. Accordingly, the Plaintiff knew that the non-party company would be insolvent, at any time, at the right end of 201, with the knowledge that the non-party company would be detrimental to the Plaintiff.

arrow