All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows: “Defendant D” among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be dismissed as “Codefendant D of the court of first instance”; the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified as follows 2; and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified as stated in paragraphs 1 and 4 of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the supplement and addition of the judgment of the following

2. Revised parts

(a) revise the last 2-way “Bain housing” to “the instant Bara”;

B. 3 pages 3 and 4 “232 square meters” (hereinafter “instant land”) are modified as follows:

(c) revise the 3rd and 6th and 6th to “Bhora”.

(d) eliminate 4 pages “construction”.

E. “At the fourth bottom to 3 classes”, “The addition byO and the plaintiff C, etc.”

(f) that the term “to move” of the last 4th parallel is to be amended as follows, and that the co-defendant D of the first instance trial does not raise any objection thereto:

(g) revise " March 16, 2010" in the last 4th parallel to " May 2009";

H. From N to 38/232 shares in the instant land, Plaintiff C received 38/9/232 shares in the instant land, S 19.9/232 shares in the case, and T 36.4/232 shares in the right side of the five pages, respectively:

Since then, on March 19, 2010, Plaintiff B purchased shares in the instant land from T and completed a share transfer registration. Plaintiff A purchased shares in the instant land on October 24, 201 in a voluntary auction procedure and completed the share transfer registration following the purchase of shares in the instant land.

(i) modify “26.4” for 5 pages to “36.4”;

3. Supplement and addition of judgment (the defendant's assertion) The defendant owned all of the building and land of this case, and according to N's decision of adjustment, the share of the land of this case.