1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as admitting the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the corresponding part of the judgment

2. A disposition of imposing indemnity should be taken by calculating the amount calculated by multiplying the land value by 0.02 with respect to the portion used as an entrance to the site of this case, even though it constitutes an occupation and use of a road of 2 pages, 6, last 4, last 4, and 3 under the attached Form “Attachment 1” by the amount calculated by multiplying 0.05 by the officially announced value of the land by the amount of 0.00,000,000,000 and the amount of 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00.

The following is added to the right side of the instant disposition: “The Plaintiff did not occupy and use the instant site without obtaining permission by intention or negligence, and thus, did not violate Article 72(2) of the Road Act, and the instant disposition was in violation of Article 72(2) of the Road Act, and the 6th side of the 6th side of the Road Act.”