The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment, and one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is against the defendant's confession of each of the crimes of this case, the victim who actually suffered injury, side effects or is dissatisfied with post-treatment due to the acts of the defendant and the B's act of the gate treatment seems to have no intention, and it can be seen that the person subject to the gate treatment has impliedly committed an illegal medical act because the person subject to the gate treatment is aware that he does not have a doctor's license, the general view of the gate is changing, and there is a need to manage the gate treatment through training through proper curriculum or regulation of sanitary facilities rather than by demanding a doctor's license.

On the other hand, the defendant had a record of criminal punishment once as a crime of arranging stolens and one-time crime of violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Unlawful Medical Service Providers). In particular, in the Manpo branch of the Gwangju District Court on December 6, 2011, sentenced one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and fine 80,000 won on the 14th of the same month, and committed the crime of this case without the person during the suspended execution period after the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month. The act of this case includes risk of causing side effects such as blood transfusion and infection, second infection, which may cause serious damage to human life and health. The defendant, who is not a doctor, clearly recognizes the fact that it was illegal, continues to engage in a literacy procedure for a considerable period of time, the defendant seems to have acquired the stolen unit price by preparing a purchase slip for each smartphone type, and it is found to have acquired the stolen unit price in this case only by smartphone.