(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.06.02 2015고단615

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.06.02 2015고단615

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2014, the Defendant refused to return to the victim D(M, 27 years old) of the former female-friendly job offering victim D on October 16, 2014, which was a dangerous object from the ctel to the victim, and caused the thalle of the victim to undergo medical treatment for about 13 days by making the head of the victim one time due to the stalle, which was a dangerous object from the stalle.

Summary of Evidence

1. In the fourth public trial protocol, witness D’s legal statement (a victim has consistently made a statement from an investigative agency to this court to the effect that he/she suffered bodily injury due to his/her storm.

However, in this court, there was no statement from the investigative agency to the effect that it was 2 to 3 times, unlike others, or that it was made by entering a flag.

Although some statements are different, in light of the fact that violence was committed at the time, and the victim did not have a mind due to the assault, and that the victim stated again the fact of damage in court more than one year after the date of occurrence of the case, it is natural rather than that of the victim in light of the fact that the victim stated again the fact of damage in court.

1. Witnesses G and the legal statements of E in the five-time public trial records;

1. That part of the witness F’s legal statement among the six-time public trial records (the defendant first placed his/her wind flag in his/her wall, but the victim was in his/her propeller;

Then, a statement to the effect that it was the same as the one stamped after lives.

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site photograph data [the defendant and his defense counsel are claiming to the effect that they had a wall flag with the wind, but the victim did not fit it, and the victim flagdd with the cremation in flag.

However, the Defendant stated at the initial investigative agency that he did not have a strong wind, and that he was paid for the winding and following the winding, but only the Defendant had a wall to the winding in this court, but did not fit the victim.

The statement is reversed.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2016.07.06 2015고단2581

-광주지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고단4735

-대구지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단4184

-수원지방법원 2020.05.28 2020고단80

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.07.19 2017고단986