logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.02 2018노5317
화장품법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In light of the following: (a) the process of importing raw materials of the grounds for appeal; (b) the statement by the relevant person; and (c) the circumstances in which the Defendant doubtfully doubtful about the ingredients of cosmetics, the Defendant was able to have dolusently known the fact that the materials of the instant cosmetics include the s the s the s theme-thro

However, the court below acquitted the charged facts of this case.

2. The lower court, without reasonable doubt, proven that the Defendant, based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor for the same reasons as the reasoning of the reasoning, did not have been aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the content of the cosmetic material of this case including betata merta damage.

It is difficult to see

The decision was determined.

Considering the circumstances cited by the lower court and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have acquitted the facts charged of this case.

① At the time of the Defendant’s operation of “D” with F, F, who was able to Chinese language, imported cosmetics in Chinese “G” and operated the same in a way that the Defendant was in charge of product management, packing, etc. (the investigation records page 224, 299). The Defendant was in direct charge of raw material import in consultation with F in 2014. The Defendant imported raw materials from the said company as it was in the way F (the investigation record 26-227 pages, the trial record 64 pages) as it was imported from the said company (the investigation record 2014 pages, the trial record 2014 page), as well as from January 2014, 2015, which was different from F, had not been detected from the above raw materials (the investigation record 226 pages), and thereafter the Defendant changed the content of cosmetics or cosmetics (the investigation record 226 pages).

There is no evidence to see.

Comprehensively taking account of these circumstances, the Defendant included stero ingredients in the cosmetic ingredients of the instant case.

There seems to be no circumstances to suspect.

② During the investigation process, the Defendant suspected of having the color of the raw material changed from the existing raw material.

The statement to the effect that “” was stated.

arrow