logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.03.13 2014고단3719
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around August 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s incomprehion philosophical library operated by the husband of the victim D in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, Seoul-si, that “A public official who works in the middle-gu office of Jung-gu, Seoul-gu, who is a public official in charge of the inside of Jung-gu, and who is a public official in charge of the affairs of KRW 20 million, who is employed as a street cleaners

However, the fact is that the defendant is not a public official as a non-permanent sanitation worker belonging to the Jung-gu Office in Ulsan Metropolitan City, and even if he has received money, he did not have the intent or ability to find the victims as a street sanitation worker of the North-gu Office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 20 million won from the Gyeongnam Bank Account (E) in the name of the Defendant on August 12, 2009 by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim.

2. Around November 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F, “A public official working in the Jung-gu Office of Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. as a street cleaners in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu., U.S., Ulsan-gu., that “A public official who works in the Gu office of Jung-gu, who is a public official in the Gu office of Jung-gu, would find employment of KRW 20 million as a street cleaners in the Gu office

However, the fact is that the defendant is not a public official as a non-permanent sanitation worker belonging to the Jung-gu Office in Ulsan Metropolitan City, and even if he is paid money, he did not have the intent or ability to find the victims as a street sanitation worker of the North-gu Office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 20 million won from the victim to the Gyeongnam bank account in the name of the Defendant on November 27, 2009, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim.

3. Around October 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s H who was present in the middle-gu Postal Dong in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, that “it may use force so that he/she can be employed to work as a street cleaners in the Ulsan-Gun Office for the street cleaners, and KRW 20 million is required.”

However, the facts are true even if the defendant received money.

arrow