logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.01.31 2017고단1660
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1660"

1. From May 2012, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C in collusion with D, E, and hearing the victim C’s speech that his children work in the modern vehicle sub-contractor, leaving the victim C, leaving the body a part of the body of his children while working in the modern vehicle sub-contractor, and introducing D to the victim “A person of F church D, who may be employed in the modern vehicle, may be employed by the children in the modern vehicle.” D is the light of the F church by telephone to the victim.

The friendship is the president of G in the G in the Ulsan Factory for Hyundai Motor Vehicles, and school windows work in the Ulsan Factory for Hyundai Motor Vehicles.

Around May 2013, E called "H" serving at the headquarters of Hyundai Motor Vehicles, and called "I would like to find a new child by requesting the director who works in the modern motor vehicle to find a job in the modern motor vehicle by asking D to the director who works in the modern motor vehicle in the position of the director who is employed in the modern motor vehicle to find a job in the modern motor vehicle."

Therefore, on June 28, 2012, the victim believed this by the same method, including delivering 4 million won in cash to D in the name of school expenses with the president of G in Ulsan Hyundai Motor in the Ulsan-si, the company located in Ulsan-si around Jun. 28, 2012, and received 55.8 million won in total from the injured party on 11 occasions from the day to September 27, 2013, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, as the victim list of crimes, in the name of expenses necessary for employment of the injured children.

However, the facts are that D and the Defendant did not have the ability to find employment for children in modern automobiles, and E did not have the head office of Hyundai Motor, and the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to find employment for the victims even if they received the above money from the victims, such as using 45 million won out of the money received from the victims for the construction cost of apartment houses located in the Southern Cancer.

In this respect.

arrow