The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable, for six months of imprisonment imposed by the defendant.

2. It is recognized that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in order to resolve his livelihood, and there are parts to be considered in the motive, that the victim G does not want the punishment of the defendant, that the damage caused by each of the crimes of this case has been fully recovered, that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case as well as that the defendant is living in good faith without recommitting the crime in the future.

However, in full view of all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, family relationship, background leading to the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be unfair, too much, in view of the following: (a) the Defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence for four months on August 24, 2010, which was sentenced to a prison term of two years on the grounds of a crime of intrusion upon a structure; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime against the victim D despite being sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 24, 2010; and (c) the Defendant did not agree with the victim D up to the

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.