The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of one-year imprisonment sentenced by the court below to the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s basic living that led to the instant crime is for the purpose of living, and there are some parts to be considered in the process of the instant crime, the agreement with some victims, and the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and misunderstanding in depth and is living in good faith without re-offending.

However, on October 24, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months for the same type of crime and was released from the prison, and committed each of the instant offenses on seven occasions in the same number as before about one year and one year prior to the date he was released from the prison despite the repeated crime. The Defendant committed each of the instant offenses on seven occasions in the same way as before the date he was released from the prison, and the sum of the amount that the Defendant committed the theft reaches about five million won in total, and most of the damages still have not yet been recovered, and the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the instant offense, etc. are comprehensively considered, and the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.