logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.20 2016노1652
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The abstract of reasons for appeal does not inflict any bodily injury on the victim;

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged and the victim C(56) are members belonging to the Democratic Nowon General D.

On August 10, 2015, the Defendant, at around 21:40 on August 21, 2015, entered a scambling with the victim, F, and G, who is a member of the said office, while taking a scambling at the Democratic Nowon-gu, Gwangju, with the victim, who was a member of the said office, and the victim laid the scambing a scam to the head of the said office.

“In accordance with the body of the victim, the victim’s breath breath was fleeped, and the victim’s right face was flicked once the victim’s right face was flicked, and the victim’s right face was flicked on the floor, and the victim was flicked for three weeks of medical treatment. In addition, the victim was flicked with the victim’s flat

B. The lower court determined that there was a fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim

The decision was determined.

(c)

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant's assertion is not accepted, since the defendant can be found to have inflicted an injury on the victim.

1. The victim had saw saws from the investigative agency to the court of the court below. The victim had saw saws from a democratic No. D office.

F and G have been entered as an office in order to have the low-income and the Defendant sent off and waiting for the low-income address, and it was time to enter the Defendant’s India Office again.

The author, immediately after the defendant leaves, calls from F, G and L (the president of a democratic Nowon-gu D branch) to the defendant's answer.

In order to the effect that “the contact was made”, specific and consistent statements were made on the circumstances at the time of the instant case and before and after.

② The victim, immediately after the instant case, she got a phone call from F, G and L to the Defendant’s test. As such, she would go to the party office.

The contact was made.

arrow