logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.12 2015고정1830
상해
Text

Defendant shall be subject to a fine of KRW 3,000,000 (three million), and where the above fine is not paid, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C(56) are members belonging to the Democratic Nowon General D.

On August 10, 2015, the Defendant, at around 21:40 on August 21, 2015, entered a scambling with the victim, F, and G, who is a member of the said office, while taking a scambling at the Democratic Nowon-gu, Gwangju, with the victim, who was a member of the said office, and the victim laid the scambing a scam to the head of the said office.

In line with “the victim’s balth, flapsed the victim’s balth, flapsed the victim’s right face by drinking once, and re-flapsed the victim’s right face face on the floor with drinking, thereby causing injury to the victim, i.e., unflading the victim’s balth and galthing the victim’s balthum that requires three-day treatment

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of witness G, F and C;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the public prosecutor and the accused by the police (including the whole part of interrogation);

1. Statement protocol with respect to G of the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a written statement, a photograph of damaged place, a written diagnosis of injury, a comprehensive patient record, a photograph of damaged part, a written statement, and a confirmation document (the No. 3, 5, 11 through 18 of the evidence list);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. In light of the circumstance and result of the above case’s sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the amount of fine specified in the summary order of this case is to be imposed in light of the conduct of the defendant before and after the crime, whether the defendant’s act was committed, whether the damage was recovered, equity with similar cases, etc.

subsection (b) of this section.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow