1. On April 16, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision that constitutes a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 14, 2006, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on December 22, 2006, when he was discharged from military service on December 21, 2010, when he was discharged from military service on December 21, 201.

B. On December 24, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State by using the different form of application as a lux (propin escape certificate, spine separation certificate) on the ground that the escape certificate and spine separation certificate (hereinafter “instant wounds”) occurred during military life.

C. On April 16, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision-making disposition on the grounds that the instant wound against the Plaintiff did not recognize that it was caused or aggravated by proximate causal relation with the military performance of official duties, and thus, the Defendant did not constitute a non-conformity of the requirements for persons of distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 9, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff had never been suffering from sacrificing or treatment before entering the military. The defendant's disposition of this case was unlawful since the injury was caused by sacratal injury during the military service and the accident that was caused by sacratal in the stone among the 61st week special sacratic sacratic sacratic sacratic sacrats in the 61st century, and the accident that was caused by sacratal sacrats in the sa

B. 1) On April 3, 2007, the Plaintiff was suffering from the injury of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body.

3 The plaintiff around December 2009.