1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Details of the disposition

On March 16, 1992, the Plaintiff entered the Gun and serves as an auxiliary police officer at the Ulsan Provincial Police Agency and the Ulsan Police Station.

On September 1, 1994, the maturity was discharged.

The plaintiff asserted that "A person who was dispatched to the site to rescue mountain mountain visitors who were in military service on February 28, 1993 and was suffering from wounds in the doctrine, etc. (hereinafter "the search work of this case")" and filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on November 4, 2005 and for registration on July 4, 2006 and on July 23, 2011, the defendant was subject to the disposition of non-competent persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on each of the above applications by the defendant.

On April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration with the Defendant on the same ground as the previous one, alleging that “The escape certificate of vertebrate-propon-propon-propon-propon-propon-propon-propon-propon-propon-propon-propon in spine (hereinafter referred to as “the first wound in spine-propon-propon-propon-pro

(C) On August 25, 2015, on August 25, 2015, the Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs rendered a decision on the amount of a soldier or policeman’s compensation (hereinafter “the disposition in this case”) to the Plaintiff on August 25, 2015, on the following grounds: (a) it is difficult to recognize that the first and second injuries in this case directly caused the occurrence of a soldier or policeman’s duty; and (b) it is difficult to recognize that the injury in this case resulted in a direct cause of a soldier or policeman’s duty; and (c) it is not deemed that the injury in this case sharply aggravated due to a cause of a soldier or policeman’s duty

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, 6, 17, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the plaintiff's assertion as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate.