The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

around 00:43 October 26, 2019, the Defendant rejected the payment of the taxi fee to B on the street in front of the hill station located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Troro 340, on the ground that the taxi fee has been high, and thereby, was recommended to pay the taxi fee from the victim D (the age of 40) who is a police officer belonging to the Yongsan-gu Police Station C District of the Gangseo-gu Police Station, which received the 112 report and dispatched, while the Defendant was viewed as the above taxi driver and an unspecified number of persons, and thereby, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim by saying, “Neeal police ought, this typopty, typopa, Neas, Neas, and this son must be observed.”

2. Judgment of insult (Article 311 of the Criminal Act) (Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act) as to the prosecution of this case (Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act), the dismissal of public prosecution as to the submission of a written withdrawal of a complaint against the accused by the victim after the prosecution of this case (Article