logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.08.12 2015고단342
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 342] On March 25, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Jinwon District Court's Jinju branch on March 25, 2014, and on January 8, 2015, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 7 million as a fine for violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) on October 3, 2014.

1. Around 22:10 on October 27, 2014, the Defendant driven a b bargaining car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.196% without obtaining a driver’s license from a 200-meter range from the front day of the 63-gil-si, Sacheon-si to the front day of the Juvenile Culture Center located in the same Dong to the juvenile culture center.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, without purchasing mandatory insurance at the same date and place as the foregoing paragraph (1), operated the said B-learning passenger car possessed by the Defendant.

[2015 Highest 539] On March 25, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court's Jinju branch on March 25, 2014. On January 8, 2015, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 7 million for a fine due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on October 3, 2014.

1. On June 16, 2015, the Defendant was driving a stove without a license for a license for a 2km section from the road front of the 53-28 Stop-si, Sacheon-si to the stove-dong from the road front of the 53-28th day of Sacheon-si, to the stove-dong, without obtaining a license for a motorcycle, and driving a stove without a license for a 0.230% alcohol concentration at the 0.230% under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act without purchasing mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) and operated the 49c Centre Round, which was held by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 342]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The register of driver's licenses (A);

arrow