[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are middle school Dong Chang-gu.

1. On June 14, 2020, at around 00:30 on June 14, 2020, the Defendants left the E-cab driven by the victim D (E, 54 years old) in order to move the second drinking place from the front side of the bus stops in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seoul, and Defendant A was on the back seat, and Defendant B was on the back seat.

피고인들은 피해자에게 “인천 택시라 김포까지는 가지 못하겠다”라는 말을 듣자 택시에서 내리면서 피고인 A는 택시 조수석 뒤쪽 문짝을 발로 걷어차고, 피해자가 “왜 문을 차냐”라고 항의하자 격분하여, 피고인 A는 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때리고, 피고인 B은 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때리며 발로 피해자의 옆구리 부위를 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant A

A. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property by walking the victim’s E-si head of E-si, even after the victim’s escape, as described in paragraph (1), at the time and place described in paragraph (1), thereby damaging the repair cost equivalent to KRW 352,274.

B. Around 00:40 on June 14, 2020, the Defendant expressed that “the Defendant was assaulted” at the place as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, at around 00:40 on June 14, 2020, the Defendant expressed that “the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender of joint assault and property damage and damage to G at the seat of the F District of the Incheon Western Police Station, which called “F District,” and that the Defendant expressed that “the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender of common assault and property damage and damage.” The Defendant expressed that “the Defendant, at the back of the patrol seat of G, expressed that the Defendant was a large voice from around the scene to the scene, she would be able to take the back part of H, which demanded him to take aboard on the back seat of the patrol.”

Accordingly, the Defendant openly insulting G and interfered with the maintenance of police officers' order and legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 reported processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to D, G, and H;

1. On-site photographs;